Aesthetics, Cosmopolitics and Design

             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Designing Debate: The Entanglement of Speculative Design and Upstream Engagemen

Tobie Kerridge

Goldsmiths, University of London, UK

t.kerridge@gold.ac.uk

Keywords: Speculative, Engagement, Qualitative, Empirical

Abstract

This paper offers a critical reflection of a design practice in which a speculative approach to design became entangled with upstream engagement with biotechnology research. Given that both practices claim to enable a public discussion about emergent technology, what is the nature of their mixing, and how should an analytical account of such a design practice be made? I focus on the project Material Beliefs as a case, and argue that the move on upstream engagement by speculative design is an imbroglio that goes beyond mixing the formal features of practice, and requires a discussion concerning the actions of the designer in relation to a broader set of accountabilities. Ultimately, I contend that this mixing provides an opportunity to foster a reflexive and empirical account of speculative practice, inciting analysis of the organisations and settings that support a speculative approach, and providing a critique of upstream engagement. 

This paper is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence.

download the paper (PDF)

Cite this paper: Kerridge, T. (2016). Designing Debate: The Entanglement of Speculative Design and Upstream Engagement . Proceedings of DRS 2016, Design Research Society 50th Anniversary Conference. Brighton, UK, 27–30 June 2016.

This paper will be presented at DRS2016, find it in the conference programme


Take part in the discussion: Your comments